Poinciana Community Development District

Agenda Package

January 21, 2026

Poinciana
Community Development District

219 E. Livingston Street, Orlando, Florida 32801 Phone: 407-841-5524 – Fax: 407-839-1526
January 14, 2026
Board of Supervisors Poinciana Community Development District
Dear Board Members:

The Board of Supervisors of Poinciana Community Development District will meet Wednesday, January 21, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. at The Gator Room, 385 Village Drive, Poinciana FL.

Zoom Information for Members of the Public: Link: https://zoom.us/j/88297815550
Dial-in Number: (646) 876-9923
Meeting ID: 882 9781 5550

Following is the advance agenda for the meeting:

Board of Supervisors Meeting
Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Public Comment Period on Agenda Items
Approval of Minutes of the November 19, 2025 Board of Supervisors Meeting
Consideration of Fishing Policies
Proposed Policies
Proposed Map
Discussion of Pond 1B Conveyance from HOA
Ratification of Data Sharing Agreement with Polk County Property Appraiser
Consideration of Proposal for Cypress Tree Removal at 481 Glendora Dr.
Discussion of Pond Dye with Solitude
Consideration of Proposal for Clam Stocking in CDD Ponds
Review of Agreement with Solitude for Littoral Plantings
Staff Reports
Attorney
Engineer
District Manager
Action Items List
Approval of Check Register
Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Field Manager’s Report
Pond Maintenance Report
Midge Management Report
Customer Complaint Log
Supervisor’s Requests
Other Business
General Audience Comments
Next Meeting Date: February 18, 2026, The Gator Room
Adjournment

Sincerely, Tricia L. Adams
District Manager

Minutes
MINUTES OF MEETING POINCIANA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Poinciana Community Development District was held Wednesday, November 19, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. via Zoom Communication Media Technology and in the Gator Room, 385 Village Drive, Poinciana, Florida.
Present and constituting a quorum were:

Jon Cameron	Chairman
Rick McKelvey	Vice Chairman
Tony Reed	Assistant Secretary
Anita Nelson	Assistant Secretary
Robert Zimbardi	Assistant Secretary Also present were:
Tricia Adams	District Manager
Jay Lazarovich	District Counsel
Kathleen Leo	District Engineer
Joel Blanco	Field Services
Residents

The following is a summary of the discussions and actions taken at the November 19, 2025, Poinciana Community Development District’s Board of Supervisors Meeting.
FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Ms. Adams called the meeting to order and called the roll at 12:01 p.m. All Supervisors were present.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSNESS	Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period on Agenda Items
Mr. Cameron opened the public comment period. There being no comments, Mr.
Cameron closed the audience comments period.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the October 15,
2025, Board of Supervisors Meeting
Mr. Cameron provided a correction under the Ninth Order of Business, to approve the invoice for the Bella Viana tunnel striping in the amount of $950. That was an old invoice. The invoice that was approved was in the amount of $1,600. Mr. Blanco would verify it. Mr. Cameron pointed out under the Tenth Order of Business, the second paragraph referred to a washout on Amalfi Lane. The amount of the bank restoration should be removed, as it was not
$18,000. Ms. Adams agreed, as the amount was not pertinent to the discussion. Mr. Lazarovich noted under the Fifth Order of Business, there was a statement by Ms. Jan Carpenter that the email was sufficient. This was regarding the License Agreement with the HOA. According to the email, it would not be sufficient.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Review of Fishing Policies
Proposed Policies
Mr. Cameron appreciated all of Mr. McKelvey’s hard work. A new draft of the proposed Fishing Policies was provided. Mr. McKelvey recalled that there was good discussion at the last meeting, as the Solivita Fishing Club and Board Members brought up many good points, since enforcing any policy was going to be difficult. Therefore, it was a good educational tool for the residents and non-residents of Solivita. The Solivita Fishing Club did a good job educating their members on the safe and respectful use of the ponds and the idea was to enlist them in this educational effort. To ensure that people had the training, they would need a permit showing that they went through the training offered by the Solivita Fishing Club. They would teach people how to respectfully treat the fish and provide alligator awareness. The bottom line was in order to fish in the ponds, participants must go through the Solivita Fishing Club training program. Mr.

Reed questioned the details of the training program. Mr. McKelvey indicated it had not been developed yet. The following residents addressed the Board:
Mr. Duanne Voss pointed out that people who wanted to fish would join the Solivita Fishing Club and come to a meeting. They would be informed of all the safety rules, like not driving a golf cart close to pond banks or behind any houses. If a homeowner asked them to leave, they would leave and fishing was strictly catch and release. Mr. Voss indicated that they had cards that they gave every new member with all the rules and regulations. At the last meeting, they were putting something together for newcomers.
Mr. McKelvey pointed out that he spoke to the President of the Solivita Fishing Club about the details that needed to be worked out and proposed adopting a policy like this by July 1st, for example, which would give the Solivita Fishing Club time to formalize the training. Mr. Cameron felt that the policy incorporates many of the items that were discussed at the last meeting. If everyone had to have a permit and they were fishing without a permit, they could be asked to leave and must leave, but if they had a permit and they violated the policy, they would lose their permit. Therefore, they should be able to get the HOA and security involved for enforcement. Mr. Lazarovich confirmed if the Board went this route, a few steps would need to be implemented, including a rate hearing and then they would need to figure out the enforcement aspect. Mr. McKelvey pointed out that the Solivita Fishing Club would handle the permit. Ms. Adams recalled that one of the questions was whether the CDD could enter into an agreement with the HOA to enforce CDD policies related to fishing and authorize them to use their subcontractor to do so. Mr. Lazarovich confirmed that the CDD could enter into an Enforcement Agreement. Mr. Cameron indicated that the Solivita Fishing Club was not under the HOA and asked if the agreement could be directly with the Solivita Fishing Club. Mr. Lazarovich must see what the Solivita Fishing Club was organized as. Mr. Cameron suggested that the HOA agree to be overseer, so that they could delegate the responsibility to the Solivita Fishing Club. Mr. Cameron questioned what was involved in the rate hearing. Mr. Lazarovich stated that it would only be for a non-resident. Mr. McKelvey pointed out that the policy indicated if they had expenses associated with the permit, the Solivita Fishing Club could charge a nominal fee. Mr. Lazarovich explained that the rate hearing was a statutory process. Notices must be sent out and there was a 35-day notice requirement and once advertised, they would have a rate hearing to

discuss the fees. There must be public comment and once the rate was adopted, then a policy would be implemented.
Mr. Mel Eldersman asked if this was for non-residents only. Mr. McKelvey indicated that the policy would be for residents, but technically a non-resident could come in and fish, but they were trying to change the policy to where they must go through the training and pay a fee, to discourage them from coming in to fish. A resident must also obtain a permit to fish. A guest would not need to get a permit but must be with the resident when they were fishing. Mr. Eldersman understood that everyone must pay to fish. Ms. Nelson confirmed that there was no charge for a resident to fish. Mr. McKelvey pointed out if the Solivita Fishing Club underwrites this completely, there would be no charge, but they could charge $1 or $2 for the permit.
Mr. Lazarovich advised that this was not an official permit, but the CDD was granting access to the stormwater ponds that were owned by the CDD, as the CDD did not have permitting powers. Mr. Cameron understood if a resident was over 65, they did not have to have a fishing permit to fish in Florida ponds, but an outsider under 65 must have a State permit, in addition to this permit. Mr. Cameron pointed out that there was no way to enforce fishing behind people’s houses, as it was strongly discouraged, but they were encouraged to use the fishing areas designated on the map. However, if a resident comes out and asked them to leave, they must leave. If they did not leave, security could be called and they could lose their permit. What it did not say, was how long they would lose their permit for and that was something that the CDD Board needed to look at it. Mr. McKelvey pointed out that they would be trespassed. Mr. Reed questioned how trespassing related to this. Mr. McKelvey indicated that the idea was that they were not welcome and were considered trespassing.
Mr. Lazarovich pointed out in that first sentence, it referred to language that there was fishing at own risk and the words, “At designated ponds,” would be added to make it clear that it was not in all ponds. Mr. McKelvey clarified that they were encouraging people to fish in designated ponds but not prohibiting fishing in other areas. Ms. Nelson felt that was a good compromise. Mr. Reed suggested changing it to, “It is encouraged to fish only in the ponds designated.” Mr. Lazarovich pointed out in the first paragraph, the word, “Anglers” was used, but was never defined, for which he would get clarification on. Furthermore, this was the CDD’s

policy and saying that anglers understand and agree, was not an agreement with those people. Ms. Adams suggested District Counsel has an opportunity to work through this document and bring it back for consideration at the next meeting. Mr. Lazarovich noted under Section 9, the last sentence stated that golf carts were prohibited, but “strictly prohibited” was used in other sections and would amend this statement. In addition, he felt that it was beneficial to have something noting if at any point they receive notice from the State permitting agency that it violated the CDD’s permits, the permits assigned and any others could be revoked. Ms. Adams suggested saying, “Fishing pass,” if the word “permit” becomes problematic. Mr. McKelvey felt that “permit” had stronger wording, as the idea was for people to have the training to use the ponds safely, which according to the President of the Solivita Fishing Club, members were on board with it.
Mr. Reed asked if the HOA was on board with what the CDD Board was working on. Mr. Cameron did not feel that it would be a problem and would be something that he could approach the HOA on. Mr. Reed believed that anyone fishing in Solivita that goes through the training, should receive a “Solivita Fishing License” and expected that the HOA would understand that, as the CDD’s concern over enforcement, had to do with fishermen in resident’s backyards too close to the property. Instead of engaging with the fishermen, the homeowner can call security. Security should then ask that fisherman, if they had a fishing permit. If they did not have one, security should ask them to leave. The idea was to minimize the resident interface with a potential problem. If security had an issue, they should call the Sheriff. This should be done with the HOA through the security contract. Ms. Nelson noted that there were two different security companies. Mr. Cameron pointed out that this did not include the ponds in Poinciana West. Mr. Cameron felt that it would be nice if it was community-wide, but they did not control anything west of Solivita Boulevard.
Ms. Sunshine Croce of 1930 Molise Drive agreed with Mr. Reed about confrontations, because when she asked someone not to fish in her backyard, it was confrontational and did not want there to be language that they were allowed to be in a backyard. Ms. Nelson pointed out that this was the purpose of the training and one of the issues that they were working with the Solivita Fishing Club on.

Mr. Tim Folton of 536 Glendora Road suggested adding, “At the residents pleasure.”
Ms. Sunshine Croce of 1930 Molise Drive asked if a Solivita Fishing Club member fishing in her backyard, could present a card saying that they were a member of the Solivita Fishing Club. Ms. Nelson felt that they should not have to. Ms. Croce voiced concern that when they were fishing, they were feeding the gator, which they were not supposed to do.
Ms. Adams pointed out that since the pond would be open for a recreational purpose, the District should reserve the right to close the pond for maintenance or any other issues. She would provide the word document that Mr. McKelvey forwarded to her to District Counsel, to add this provision, make any other recommended changes and bring it back to final approval by the Board. Mr. McKelvey recalled asking Ms. Adams to consider posting additional signage, as they already had alligator signage. Ms. Adams reported that the recommendation of the insurance company was posting signage about fishing at own risk, at proposed fishing locations with signage reiterating key issues. Mr. McKelvey asked if they could have a QR code. Ms. Adams replied affirmatively, but there would be recommended language from the insurance provider regarding dangers and risks. They could utilize existing posts to save money.
Ms. Rose Kerr of 389 Sorrento Road did not see how the fishing pass would work and questioned how they would get the word out. Mr. McKelvey confirmed that the Chair of the Communications Committee, was willing to help get the word out.
A Resident asked if there was a possibility to remove the language where they could go behind people’s houses to fish, as it was a double negative. Mr. Lazarovich pointed out that Provision 10 said fishing behind a resident’s home was not recommended but not specifically prohibited. Ms. Nelson asked if Mr. McKelvey asked the Solivita Fishing Club why they wanted this provision in there. Mr. McKelvey indicated that it was a tradition, but eliminating this language would not prohibit it. The policy would not allow someone to be behind their house. It was difficult to enforce, but would encourage people to do the right thing, as there currently was no policy. Mr. Lazarovich pointed out that further down in that section, it says if the area was shorter between the home and CDD

property, they should avoid it. Ms. Nelson noted that this was part of the education by the Solivita Fishing Club.
Mr. Duanne Voss pointed out that their policy was fishing where there was public access and not behind anyone’s house. If the Club heard a complaint about someone driving a golf cart behind their house, they would investigate it. Most of the time, it turned out to be a snowbird or someone visiting. Mr. Reed recalled that Mr. Zimbardi witnessed a Solivita resident driving their golf cart on CDD pond banks, resulting in the individual almost going into the pond. Technically, they should not be on CDD property or on the pond banks and was in favor of security telling them to get out, but they could not do this without the HOA agreeing to it. He also wanted to minimize the liability, because the golf cart almost rolled over into the pond. Mr. Cameron confirmed that there was no CDD property damage.
Ms. Rose Kerr of 389 Sorrento Road asked if anyone could walk in from outside of Solivita to fish. Mr. Lazarovich indicated that the policy says that they could not do so and had to go through these steps. Mr. Reed pointed out that no fishing was allowed and was enforceable by security and the Sheriff.
Ms. Sunshine Croce of 1930 Molise Drive approved of people fishing, as long as it was in their own backyard, but requested that the language be re-worded that they could not go into other people’s backyards. Mr. McKelvey pointed out that the goal was to start out with this and if issues cropped up, they could add to it, as the number of cases where this was an issue, was relatively small and was confident that with the educational program by the Solivita Fishing Club, it would minimize those circumstances.
Mr. Lazarovich asked if there was communication with the HOA to amend the policy and delete it from their declaration. Mr. Cameron confirmed that no formal action had been taken and to change anything in the Master Declaration, there must be a community vote. There were discussions at the HOA meeting about not changing the Master Declaration one item at a time. The HOA wanted to compile all the things that needed to be changed, include it in one policy and have the ownership members vote on it at an annual meeting.

Ms. Sharon Burns of 328 Sorrento Road reported on Sunday, the 16th, two adults crossed over an area that was taped off and onto the pond bank. On the 17th, two small boys went over the gate and started fishing, all by themselves. She tried to be patient and ended up calling security. They were fishing because the gate was taken down and there was yellow tape. Now they were fishing on the opposite side of the pond where they lived, which was non-Solivita property. She was informed by Mr. Blanco that there would be a gate with a padlock. The kids should not have been there, but now the Board was saying that they could come onto her property and fish. Mr. Cameron noted that this was not what the Board was saying. The CDD had approval from the HOA to access that area, so staff could mow the other side of the lake, but the CDD did not have any control over the HOA’s contract. The gate would eventually be locked and then the HOA would be able to use that gate to mow the backside of the wall.
There was Board consensus for Mr. Lazarovich to provide a revised draft policy to the Board at the next meeting.

Proposed Map
Ms. Adams presented the proposed fishing location map, which was included in the agenda package. Mr. McKelvey indicated that the Fishing Club would help to designate areas of ponds that had no houses around the pond, with the goal of encouraging people to fish in these areas. The little black dots were designated fishing areas. Ms. Adams pointed out that the map was prepared by field staff and any comments from Board Members, were incorporated. Ms. Nelson felt that people should be able to fish all the way around D9, the Shorehaven Pond, because there were no houses around it. Mr. Blanco would make this revision.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	French	Drain
Application
Ms. Adams recalled that several years ago, the Board adopted a policy to address erosion issues on CDD property where residential drain lines terminated, because the water was gushing out. The policy had specifications for the way that drains should be installed, if they're terminating on CDD property. The only time that the CDD would get involved, was if a resident or property owner had a request to install a drain line that terminates on CDD property. If that's

the case, an application was required, which included an application fee, diagram and Drain Installation Plan, which were included in the agenda package, along with an engineer’s document, which was prepared by Ms. Kathy Leo. Where the drain terminated, there was a pop-up emitter, which diffused the water, preventing erosion on CDD property. The District Office received an application for an installation and recommended that the Board approve it, subject to staff review. Once it was signed off on, they would enter into a form of agreement, which was also included in the agenda package. This would be a recorded document that stays with the parcel. Mr. Cameron questioned the permit fee. Ms. Adams indicated that it was $75, which included Ms. Leo’s review fee. Mr. Cameron pointed out that the popup was outside of the water line and asked if this was typical. Ms. Leo confirmed that this was the detail that was given to the resident. It needed to be outside, as otherwise the installation would be difficult. Ms. Adams pointed out that Mr. Pasquissi was in attendance, in case the Board had any questions.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Grass Carp and Barrier
Screen Proposal
Mr. Blanco presented a proposal that was prepared by the District’s service provider for pond maintenance, which was included in the agenda package. The proposal was for permitting barriers and a one-time stocking for grass carp on Pond B1, as an alternative to the algicide that was used throughout all the ponds to treat the hydrilla. It was in the amount of $3,100. Mr. Zimbardi asked if Pond B1 had hydrilla. Mr. Blanco confirmed that B1 did not have hydrilla, but the Board wanted to explore options for the ponds and B1 was the pilot pond. Grass carp was one option, if one of the ponds had hydrilla. Mr. McKelvey understood that B1 may not be the ideal candidate for this experimental program. Mr. Blanco indicated there was no present hydrilla in B1 but could check with the technician to see which ponds were experiencing the worst of the hydrilla, if this type of method was effective for that specific pond and come back to the Board. Mr. McKelvey felt that made more sense. Mr. Reed agreed, as they needed to have a more comprehensive plan, but asked if these were non-native or native fish. Mr. Blanco would have to check. There was Board consensus to defer this item.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Proposal for Littoral
Plantings
Mr. Blanco recalled at prior meetings, it was noted by residents that lived around the chain of ponds on Shorehaven, that the fireflags planted by the developer, were ugly and dying. As a result, he reached out to Solitude for a proposal to remove all the fireflags and replant Duck Potato, Pickerelweed and Spikerush, which were beneficial plants thriving on other ponds and were more aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Cameron asked if it would be around the entire perimeter of the pond. Mr. Blanco replied affirmatively. Ms. Adams pointed out that a handout was available to residents and Board Members. On the specification sheet, there was a picture of the Spikerush, Pickerelweed and Duck Potato. Ms. Leo asked if they needed 100% coverage or a percentage around the perimeter. Mr. Blanco wanted like for like littorals that were aesthetically pleasing. There was no erosion in there that would necessitate having 100% coverage and recommended 80% littorals and 20% area where there were no littorals. Mr. Cameron pointed out that Pond D8 had similar issues and asked if there was a plan to plant littorals on this pond. Mr. Blanco indicated if the Board wanted to move in that direction it was something that he could obtain a proposal for. The only ponds that had fireflags were the Shorehaven chain of ponds. Mr. Reed wanted to add plants to stop erosion.
Ms. Nelson spoke to residents on Pond D8, who wanted the fireflags to be removed. Resident Jim Cole was one of those residents. Mr. McKelvey was in favor of proceeding with this proposal and then work on a proposal to do the other ponds but questioned the season for doing the plantings. Mr. Blanco indicated it was ideal to do it during the dry season. Mr. McKelvey requested that Mr. Blanco come back in January with another proposal. Ms. Leo asked if the plantings were done in a cross section. Mr. Blanco confirmed that it was done in clusters on Pond E3; however, the Pickerelweed and Duck Potato were spaced out and filled in between them with Spikerush. Ms. Adams recalled that previously Clarke included a warranty in their proposals of six months for 80% survival but did not see that in this proposal. Mr. Blanco would reach out to the Account Manager for Solitude. Mr. Cameron questioned how big the plants were and how long it would take to mature. Mr. Blanco recalled that it took half of a year for the littorals to start growing in E3. Currently, the littorals in E3 were mature. Mr. Reed pointed out that the warranty should be six months to a year.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Presentation of Research on the Use of
Pond Dye
Mr. Reed provided summary sheets to the Board and presented his research on the use of pond dye. One of the things that intrigued him, was that there was no one solution to resolve all Solivita’s problems. It takes a combination and experimentation. The only thing that they missed in their discussions, was that they treat algae after the fact and were spending a great deal of money to do so. Therefore, in this review, he wanted to look at what they could do to prevent algae, so they did not have to spend money to treat it. One solution was pond dye, which reduced sunlight penetration. There was a study done in The Villages, where they put pond dye in 10 ponds, to try to determine whether it would prevent algae. However, Phase 1 of that test would not end until January of 2026. They had EPA grants, HOA funding and CDD funding totaling
$150,000. He also spoke with some professors who wanted $10,000 to be involved as consultants. However, they did not need to pay these professors and instead, they needed to research it themselves. Mr. Reed recommended selecting four ponds, putting dye in two of the ponds and putting in dye plus bacteria in the other two ponds. In his research, he also found that this would also help with midges. However, he could not prove that yet, but it was possible. He provided a plan that he would like to commence with, if everyone agreed. To start, he needed a raw sample of water, to tell what the oxygen content of the water was, before they installed aerators, as he did not know if there was an aeration issue. There were other things that they could do, other than the pond dye, such as aeration, but his plan was to put dye in two ponds and dye plus bacteria in the other two ponds and suspend chemicals for the duration of the test. Then they would find a pond in Solivita where they had electricity close enough to do an aeration test, in addition to the pond dye and bacteria. However, it would cost $50,000 to aerate one pond and they had over 100 ponds in Solivita, so there was no cost benefit, but dye would cost half of what they were spending on chemicals.
Ms. Nelson was familiar with the dye, as her son lived near a pond that had dye, but it did not work, because the pond must be shallow enough for the dye to do the work; however, if they were going to stop all chemical use, she questioned what happens if the midges increase in the

test pond. Mr. Reed pointed out that this test was only for the algae treatment and they would stop the chemical use for the algae treatment only. Mr. McKelvey asked if this would work in deep ponds. Mr. Reed confirmed that it did not work as well. However, if they shade the water so that sunlight did not penetrate it, they had a chance to minimize the amount of algae that was formed, so that it did not spread out all over the pond, which was what he wanted to test for and what was being tested in The Villages. Mr. McKelvey recalled that they had a proposal on bacteria, but it was pricy. Mr. Reed did not want to rule out anything until he does the research. Ms. Nelson preferred to hire an expert such as from the university. Mr. Reed felt that they could do what the consultants do, without spending all that money. Ms. Nelson pointed out that Mr. Reed did not want to spend money but wanted the ponds to be in good shape and sometimes they had to spend money to make the ponds look good.
Mr. Cameron wanted to know the cost and if they could alter the contract of their vendor for those ponds, in addition to what has already been raised. Mr. Reed pointed out that they already had the level of expertise with Solitude, who was also the contractor for The Villages. They were using dye and bacteria in The Villages ponds and doing a test and proposed doing the same thing on four ponds in Poinciana, to see if it worked. Ms. Leo felt that Mr. Reed did a great deal of great research and recommended finding out the results of The Villages testing and coordinating with them and offered to contact them. Mr. McKelvey felt that this was worth exploring. Ms. Nelson agreed. Mr. Zimbardi wanted to explore the grants. Mr. Cameron suggested obtaining a copy of the grant that The Villages used. Mr. McKelvey suggested having someone from Solitude come and speak at the next CDD meeting about their experience with pond dye and bacteria. Mr. Reed agreed, as they could explain what they were doing in The Villages and how they were doing it. Mr. Cameron liked the idea of having Solitude come at the January meeting and provide their experience with pond dyes and bacteria in The Villages. There was Board consensus to invite Solitude to the January meeting.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Designation  of  Chairman  to  Discuss
Potential Transfer of Wetlands and Stormwater Ponds to CDD
Mr. Cameron reported meeting with Taylor Morrison, as a follow up to the status of the License Agreement that was sent to them last month and the status of the plans to repair the three bridges on the golf course. Ms. Nora Schuster brought up wetlands and ponds, but he made it

clear that he had no authority to make any commitments. But in public meetings, this Board appeared to be amenable to owning all the wetlands. Mr. Cameron indicated that he was not stating anything that was out of order but felt that they needed to start having discussions on that issue. Ms. Adams recalled that the Board adopted an Application Policy, that included an application fee to cover legal and engineering fees, as well as an estimate of the cost to maintain the ponds for the year and other helpful information. Therefore, this was a pre-application meeting to sort out what they were looking at potentially conveying to the District. In addition to discussions with Taylor Morrison, at last month’s meeting, it was identified that there was a pond that was half owned by the CDD and half by the HOA and in addition to the discussions with Taylor Morrison, at some point, there may need to be discussions with the HOA. Ms. Nelson questioned whether there was a benefit to owning the wetlands. Ms. Adams indicated that the CDD was the permit holder for the stormwater system. Ms. Leo explained when they researched this topic, the Engineer’s Report for the bond issue, discussed the wetlands being part of the master stormwater system and ultimately being conveyed to the CDD at some point. The stormwater permits were all interwoven with the wetlands and the discharge point for most of the ponds. Some flow through the wetlands and was part of the conveyance system throughout a broader system. Since the developer no longer had an interest in what was going in the project from 10 years ago, she felt that it was in best interest of the District to take on the wetlands, but they needed to look through the permits to make sure 100% that there were not any additional long term reporting requirements. Ms. Nelson questioned whether there was any downside to the CDD owning the stormwater ponds. Ms. Leo did not think so, if there were no long-term permit obligations. Mr. Reed understood in perpetuity, the CDD was responsible to ensure that invasive species in their wetlands do not exceed 10% to 15%. If they do, the permit requires the CDD to pay for fixing it. Ms. Leo pointed out that this was standard language on every permit that was written by the South Florida Water Management District, for the protection of the environment. In her experience, she had never seen any CDD that had to take care of invasives. It could potentially happen, but it was highly unlikely. Ms. Nelson pointed out that it did not matter whether the CDD owned the wetlands or not, they were still responsible for them on the permit. Mr. Cameron felt that it was a moot issue, as it was already the CDD’s responsibility, whether they owned them or not. Ms. Adams recommended that the Board approve a carte blanche

motion for the Chairman to represent the CDD when discussing property conveyances either with the HOA or the developer.

Mr. Reed pointed out that the CDD had an agreement with Taylor Morrison to pay for an engineering and legal overview of property transfer. It has worked fine, as the CDD was paid on time, but he understood that the wetland process was to carry forward until they were completely gone and they needed to make sure that was the case. It was his opinion, that Taylor Morrison should continue to pay for the cost of legal and engineering reviews. Ms. Adams confirmed that for the District to consider the conveyance of property from Taylor Morrison, there was an application process including fees.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Report	from	Supervisor	Nelson
Regarding CDD Accounting
Mr. Cameron recalled at the last meeting, the Board provided some questions to Ms. Nelson, and she was designated as the CDD’s representative to talk with the accounting firm. Ms. Nelson provided the answers to the Board and asked if they had any questions. Mr. Cameron asked if the accountant provided an organizational chart. Ms. Nelson indicated that the accountant planned to provide her with one; however, they had 13 people handling 97 CDDs. Mr. Cameron pointed out that they did not handle GMS payroll, but they handled payroll for the Supervisors. Ms. Nelson confirmed that they did not handle GMS payroll, but they handled anything having to do with the CDD. Mr. Cameron indicated that he did not specifically approve the attorney and engineering invoices, but sees them after the fact, in case he had any questions. Ms. Nelson explained that once the invoice comes in, it was recorded and then they forward it to the District Manager. Ms. Adams confirmed that the Chair was copied. Ms. Nelson pointed out that she felt much more comfortable, as she now knew why their reports did not match the Check

Register. It was due to a timing issue. She would much rather have the correct report with all the information in it, than to receive three different reports for the same period with conflicting information. Mr. Cameron pointed out if Ms. Nelson was happy, the Board was happy. Ms. Nelson confirmed that she was happy.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney
Mr. Lazarovich reported that the Licensing Agreement with Avatar was still under review with their legal department but would keep an eye out for it. Mr. Cameron indicated that he contacted Avatar earlier in the week but did not get a response. Mr. Lazarovich wanted to get clarification on the License Agreement with the HOA, as it was his understanding that the HOA was supposed to prepare it, but had not received anything to date. Mr. Cameron spoke to the President, who was not aware of it. Mr. Lazarovich reported that an Easement Agreement was needed for the gate. Mr. Cameron understood that there needed to be a new License Agreement to open the gate that the CDD just paid for, to access E21, but did not understand why they would have to go through that gate and make a right hand turn to go through 10 feet of CDD land, when their contractor would continue to mow coming from the street and would not ever use it. Therefore, they were paying for half of a gate that they would never use and asked if a License Agreement was necessary to access CDD property. Mr. Lazarovich pointed out if it was to get to CDD property, it was not needed and believed there might have been some misunderstanding and would get something together. Mr. Cameron believed that there should be discussion about transferring ownership to half of that pond. Mr. Lazarovich asked if they should have that discussion before they prepare an agreement. Mr. Cameron understood that the HOA wanted the CDD to mow it and there needed to be an agreement to allow the CDD to mow their side of the pond. Mr. Lazarovich would prepare the agreement.

Engineer
There being no comments, the next item followed.

District Manager
Action Items List

Ms. Adams presented the Action Items List, which was included in the agenda package. Many of these items were already discussed. Mr. Cameron reviewed it but did not see anything. Mr. Reed would like to understand how the clam stocking was going. Mr. McKelvey requested an update on the clams at the January meeting. Mr. Blanco recalled at a prior meeting, there was discussion about providing a report on the result of the clams and could provide something during his Field Manager’s Report. Mr. Cameron requested a report at the January meeting.

Approval of Check Register
Ms. Adams presented the Check Register for October 7, 2025, through November 7, 2025, totaling $52,778.35, which was included in the agenda package, along with the detailed invoices and Check Run Summary.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Ms. Adams presented the Unaudited Financial Statements through September 30, 2025, which were included in the agenda package. No Board action was required, as the financials were provided for informational purposes. They provided a good picture of cash balances for Fiscal Year 2025. Mr. Cameron asked if they received more from the tax roll than what was budgeted. Ms. Adams replied affirmatively, as some taxpayers were not taking the early payment discount. The District was on par with the budget for administrative expenses, but overall, the adopted budget was $150,564 and actual spending was $151,701. Field items were slightly under, but for total expenditures, the budgeted amount was $889,298 and actual spending was
$848,447, for a difference of $40,851, which remains in the General Fund. Mr. Cameron asked if the Property Appraiser changed their rate, as $7,000 was budgeted, but they billed $9,500. Ms. Adams confirmed that it was a percentage of what was collected but would investigate this further. Mr. Cameron appreciated that.

Field Manager’s Report
Mr. Blanco presented the Field Manager’s Report, which was included in the agenda package. The additional landscaping that was approved at the last meeting, to clean up the landscaping bed to the left of the Bella Viana exit ramp and E-21 bush hogging, was completed. The Bella Viana landscaping beds were de-weeded and dead Oleander tree branches were removed throughout that area. The E-21 bush hogging was scheduled for and completed last week. Landscaping reviews were conducted throughout the District. The CDD owned buffer area behind Umbria Drive, has been consistently moved with overhanging branches to be trimmed off. Pond tracts have been neatly mowed, especially closer to the waterline, to clean up those beds, in preparation for the Spring and Summer months. A resident at 981 Glendora Road, reported that a trio of Cypress trees were getting close to her home and requested Board consideration for removal of those trees. The area was reviewed and staff found tree roots close to her lanai. Ms. Nelson asked if it was a CDD responsibility. Mr. Blanco checked with the Property Appraiser website, and it was determined to be on CDD property. Mr. Cameron asked if they normally remove trees. Ms. Adams indicated that it was up to the Board. Mr. Blanco recalled this occurring on a pond in Poinciana West and the trees were removed for $5,000. Ms. Nelson asked if the homeowner was amenable to moving the trees. Mr. Blanco indicated that the homeowner wanted to see if the trees could be removed. There was Board consensus for field staff to bring back a proposal to remove the trees and provide at the next meeting.
Mr. Blanco reported that the District Engineer provided a list of wetland crossing checkpoints for field review. Four areas were within Poinciana that he did review. One needed the removal of vegetation that was growing close to a culvert on Bell Tower Crossing West. He could also obtain a proposal to cut back the vegetation, so they have better flow. A resident on 4042 Via Toledo Drive requested Board consideration of maintenance for a landscaping bed on a CDD tract, on the corner of P-5 for bush and palm trimming. They were currently looking at that with Floralawn. Both the Venezia Tunnel and Shorehaven Park, have been consistently maintained in satisfactory standards, like surrounding HOA maintained areas. Field Staff has continued to review the ponds alongside the aquatics vendor throughout the District. Mr. Cameron recalled that staff was looking at a cost to replace the lights in the tunnel, because many of them were cracked. Mr. Blanco planned to have something for the January meeting, as he was

working with another Field Manager who had expertise on it. They were looking at getting LED lights that had full range and whether stucco work needed to be completed. Two options would be provided for each tunnel, in case the Board wanted to do one tunnel, but not the other.
Regarding the ponds, Mr. Blanco reported that during the dry season, the landscape vendor was mowing closer to the waterline, and the aquatics vendor was spraying in between littorals to treat weeds to clean the area. That was something that he was communicating to residents. The Board already reviewed the proposal to remove the fireflags. Field staff has been monitoring the A9 bank for the entire year (Winter, Spring, Summer and Fall). The bank had prominent shelving with some littorals present. Staff recommended planting Spikerush, to help support the backside of the pond. A resident claimed that they lost a significant amount of land; although, if any erosion was occurring, it was always CDD land first and then resident land, which the resident was informed about, but the resident was claiming that there was significant erosion over the years. Mr. Blanco obtained the Property Appraiser map from 2024, showing a photo of the ponds during that time. Based on the pictures, there was nothing significant. However, there was prominent shelving and recommended having Spikerush added there to support the bank more and offered to provide a proposal at the next meeting. Ms. Adams asked if there was clarification on whether they needed a proposal for maintenance of a corner of P5. Mr. Reed recalled that Mr. Blanco was going to get one. Mr. Cameron spoke to Floralawn this morning and was told that the homeowner wanted to have it trimmed, to have more of a lake view. Floralawn said that they could trim the Palm and tighten up the shrubs at no cost but not cut them down. There was Board consensus to do a one-time trimming and tightening up of the shrubs. Mr. Blanco would follow up with the resident.

Pond Maintenance Report
Mr. Blanco presented the Pond Maintenance Report, which was included in the agenda package. The first one received was last month's meeting and this would be the second time Solitude was providing this. There was always that one pond that they had trouble with every year and it seems like this year, it was the chain of wands on Shorehaven. This was something that he was working with the aquatic’s vendor on and the technician that was onsite that applied the algaecide for Solivita. They were in communication in addressing the algae, not just the common algae, but a mix of baby tears, hydrilla, the common algae. They also addressed the

edge grasses that were growing out three or four feet, to have it looking more presentable at the start of the year.

Midge Management Report
Customer Complaint Log
Mr. Blanco presented the Midge Management Reports and Customer Complaint Log, which were included in the agenda package. Clarke made them aware if any resident wanted them spray the midge fogger closer to their homes, they needed to be request it through field staff and it would be communicated to them. A couple of residents did request this, and staff was retaining a log, which was included in the agenda package.

Consideration of Adding Larvicide Treatment to Pond C4
Mr. Blanco presented a proposal to add a larvicide treatment to Pond C4, which was included in the agenda package. He heard from Ms. Cherrief Jackson of Clarke Midge Control, quite a few times, at the end of June or July, October and earlier this week, to report midge activity. Since that time, they always reached out to Clarke and had a fogging done for that pond. Videos were provided as well, which he forwarded to the Board. Ms. Jackson reviewed this pond and had the technicians go out there to do the fogging, to provide a report on the conditions of that pond. Based on his conversations with Ms. Jackson, it was not the worst that she had seen. October was the worst outbreak of midges, but the times that she has gone out, it has not been as bad as other ponds and recommended three months of larvicide of a pond to see if it helped. Mr. Cameron asked if the $2,200 was for three times. Mr. Blanco indicated it was a yearly fee to add larvicide to the agreement. Mr. Cameron asked if the Board wanted to approve three months or a year. Ms. Nelson preferred to do the entire year.

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor’s Requests
Mr. Reed pointed out when Mr. Cameron was negotiating or talking with the HOA about the property conveyances, he was concerned that the west did not intend to officially take the property, but what was anticipated, was that they were going to turn it over to the HOA and then

the HOA was going to turn it over to this CDD. If this occurred, Mr. Reed did not want the CDD to be responsible for paying legal and engineering review fees. Ms. Nelson pointed out that this was the reason why both CDDs should join. Mr. Lazarovich confirmed that the CDD would not own it. The CDD would only be the permit holder. Mr. Cameron pointed out that the CDD would never be the owner or permit holder of those wetlands in CDD west, unless the CDDs joined together, but they could not prevent the developer from transferring them to the HOA.

FOURTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business
There being no comments, the next item followed.

FIFTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	General Audience Comments
Ms. Rose Kerr of 389 Sorrento Road thanked Mr. Blanco for having Clarke come and spray closer to homes. Ms. Sharon Burns of 328 Sorrento Road thanked Mr. Blanco for handling the situation with the gate, as this was her big concern, but she still was not happy with the lock on the gate and hoped that it would always be locked once the gate was installed. However, since the midges were so bad this year, Ms. Burns asked if the midges could be sprayed. Mr. Blanco would have Clarke handle any outbreak of midges. Ms. Burns requested that they come close to her house. Yesterday, she had an issue with children, but the guard at the Bella Viana gate could not leave her post. Ms. Nelson indicated that there was a rover. A Resident asked where Poinciana West was located. Ms. Nelson indicated that it was in Solivita. When Mr. Cameron referred to the west, he meant west of Solivita Boulevard, coming in from the middle gate. The Resident noted that around the ponds where they were planting littorals, during the Summer, the plants had muck and questioned whether that was the purpose of these plants. Mr. Blanco explained that the littoral plantings help with the water quality on the ponds and with the integrity of the bank, to prevent erosion and helped with the runoff. However, the littorals do hold some of the algae, but it was treated algae. It helped contain the algae, so it does not go towards the middle of the pond. The Resident asked if the Spikerush would keep growing out into the middle of the pond on B5. Mr. Blanco pointed out that this was why he recommended spraying the Spikerush during the Summer from the outside, which tended to grow towards the inside of the pond. Ms. Adams suggested that the Field Manager speak to the resident after the meeting.

A Resident requested that Ponds C4 and C3 to be included with the littoral plantings. Ms. Barbard Reinhold of 3639 Via Monte Napoleone Drive thanked Mr. Blanco for handling the midges. It was interesting to talk about the transfer of properties, as the C4 pond had an overflow and then it flows into a wetland area. This was a unique area because it was surrounded by wetlands but questioned how the permitting works. Ms. Leo explained that the applicant and owner of the permit was the CDD or they were transfers to the CDD, which was what they were talking about. It included the wetland areas and changing the ownership of the land from the developer to the CDD. Ms. Reinhold indicated that she was trying to understand whether these wetland areas were being treated for midges. Mr. Reed pointed out that they were not allowed by permit to spray. Ms. Reinhold asked if there was any coordination with Poinciana West. Mr. Cameron explained that they were a separate governmental entity, with their own elected Board. Ms. Reinhold did research on midges and found out that they did not like bright lights and they liked the big, tall bushes and paint. If a house was painted, they would get stuck on the surface. Mr. Blanco would send the barrier treatment program for residential property that Clarke prepared, to Ms. Reinhold. Mr. Jim Pasquazi, 300 Bell Tower Crossing West introduced himself to the Board and thanked the Board Members for their time and commitment.

SIXTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Status of December 17, 2025, Meeting
Mr. Cameron pointed out that the next meeting was supposed to be on December 17th, but they requested reports for January, as they did not know if there would be a quorum for this meeting. Ms. Adams would leave the meeting as scheduled and see what they had for the agenda. If there was nothing time sensitive, Mr. Cameron would cancel the meeting.

SEVENTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman

Section V

Section A

DRAFT: 1/14/2026 (LLEB comments) POINCIANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
FISHING AND STORMWATER POND POLICIES

Recreational ﬁshing in Poinciana Community Development District (PCDD) ponds is permitted AT YOUR OWN RISK. The District is not responsible for any loss, damage, or injury to any person or property arising out of the authorized or unauthorized use of the PCDD ponds or any other property within the District. Fishing is permitted only from the banks of PCDD stormwater ponds (Ponds) from dawn to dusk and subject to the terms and conditions herein. The Ponds may have steep banks and are not designed, nor permitted, for recreational use, and entry into or near the banks of the Ponds may be dangerous and could result in serious bodily harm. Entering into or wading in the Ponds is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Persons authorized to ﬁsh in PCDD Ponds: in order to ﬁsh in PCDD Ponds, adults (18 years of age or older) shall have in their possession a PCDD Fishing Pass. The PCDD Fishing Pass is provided following the successful completion of the Solivita Fishing Club (SFC) Fishing Training Program. The SFC shall maintain records of those individuals that completed the training, which shall include the date of the training and certiﬁcation of the successful completion signed by a designated SFC trainer. PCDD residents, who have successfully completed the SFC training, shall receive the PCDD Fishing Pass at no charge, except that the SFC may charge PCDD residents a nominal fee to oRset their costs of administering the program. Adults who do not reside or lease property within the PCDD, may obtain a PCDD Fishing Pass only after successfully completing the SFC training and shall pay an annual fee of $[	] (Non-Resident User Fee). [TBD: Residents of the Poinciana West Community Development District (PWCDD) may obtain a PCDD Fishing Pass only after successfully completing the SFC training and shall pay an annual fee of $[ ] (PWCDD User Fee).] The Non-Resident User Fee shall not be prorated and is only valid for the then-current calendar year and shall expire on December 31 of the year of issuance.

While ﬁshing, minors and guests of PCDD residents are required to be supervised and accompanied by an adult possessing a PCDD Fishing Pass. Any person determined to be ﬁshing while not in possession of a valid PCDD Fishing Pass must cease ﬁshing
Deleted: 11/15/2025
Deleted: is allowed
Formatted: Justified
Deleted: Ponds
Deleted: Poinciana Community Development District (
Deleted: ) Deleted: , Deleted: Dawn
Deleted: Dusk. Anglers understand
Deleted: agree that Deleted: stormwater ponds Deleted: uses;
Deleted: and Deleted: ponds Deleted: ponds Deleted: ponds Deleted: ponds Deleted: Permit Deleted: permit
Deleted: in conjunction with the
Deleted: after participating in and successfully completing the SFC …
Deleted: completing Deleted: Solivita Deleted: Permit Deleted: Solivita Deleted: are
Deleted: residents of Solivita,
Deleted: ,
Deleted: fee of $	. The non-resident
Deleted: will
Commented [JL1]: Intent: this policy can only be for..t.h[e1]
Deleted: good
Deleted: all or any portion of a
Deleted: expires
Formatted: Normal, Justified, Indent: Left: 0.5"
Deleted: Solivita Formatted: Justified Deleted: Permit
Deleted: Permit shall leave PCDD property when ... [2]

activities immediately upon request by PCDD personnel or another entity designated by PCDD. The Fishing Pass may be revoked at any time by PCDD for failure to comply with this Policy.

The Ponds are a habitat for dangerous wildlife, including poisonous snakes, snapping turtles, and alligators. Be aware that wildlife, both in and near Ponds, may be present and active, posing a serious threat to personal safety. Feeding or approaching alligators or any other wildlife is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Wildlife may not be removed from or released into the PCDD stormwater system. Anyone concerned about a nuisance alligator is encouraged to contact the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s toll-free Nuisance Alligator Hotline at 866-FWCGATOR (866-392-4286).

The Ponds are designed to gather and ﬁlter pollutants before they enter nearby natural bodies of water. Therefore, the Ponds may be contaminated with pollutants such as sediments, oils, grease, trash, heavy metals, pesticides, herbicides, and pathogens. Contact with the Ponds may be hazardous to health and safety. All ﬁshing in the Ponds is strictly on a catch and release basis.

All trash must be properly disposed of oR-site, including but not limited to ﬁshing lines.

Boating on any Pond, canal, or culvert for any purpose other than maintenance or repair authorized by PCDD is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Alteration of the Ponds, including adding or removing plantings and vegetation, for any purpose is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. The PCDD retains all rights and remedies to pursue and collect costs for any damage to PCDD property or ﬁnes and penalties for noncompliance with stormwater permits.

The use of golf carts on any Pond bank or adjacent landscape buRer, or on any PCDD property that is otherwise adjacent to any Pond bank, canal, or culvert is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Residential/private property shall not be utilized or walked over to gain access to ﬁshing areas. Easements through residential backyards along the community’s stormwater management system are for maintenance purposes only and are not general grants for access for ﬁshing or any other recreational purpose. In order to ﬁsh

in the Ponds, users must gain access to the Ponds via common access areas. Parking of golf carts or any other vehicles on grassy or landscaped areas near or contiguous to the Ponds is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

The PCDD has identiﬁed the pond locations where ﬁshing may be preferred (see attached map) and are identiﬁed with appropriate signage. In addition to this policy, all users shall obey all posted signage in connection with use of the Ponds. Fishing behind residential/private property is not recommended. At all times, ﬁshing in the Ponds shall occur only from within PCDD property (as designated). Access to residents’ backyards via the maintenance easements is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. All users shall avoid ﬁshing behind residential properties where the property line is in close proximity to the PCDD Pond. Residents have a reasonable expectation of privacy and security, so users should use common sense and respect when ﬁshing on PCDD property so as not to trouble, inconvenience, or interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of the adjacent property by and of the homeowner. Upon request by the adjacent homeowner to move to an alternate location, the user shall immediately relocate to another Pond. Failure to do so could result in the revocation of the PCDD Fishing Pass.

All ﬁshing shall comply with all applicable state and local laws, ordinances, codes, regulations, and permits. All users should be aware of and comply with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FWC’s) guidelines for freshwater ﬁshing, including licensing requirements, to promote responsible ﬁshing. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the PCDD shall at any time receive notice from any governmental agency or authority that the use(s) of the Ponds described herein violate any applicable state or local laws, ordinances, codes, regulations, permits or otherwise may place additional liability on the PCDD, the PCDD retains the right in its sole discretion to revoke all Passes and rescind this policy immediately, without notice; however, a statement shall be made at the next available PCDD Board meeting.

 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, all users or other members of the public shall comply with all PCDD directives in connection with the Ponds, including, but not limited to, temporary closure of the Ponds for maintenance, repair or any other reason within the sole discretion of PCDD.

Any stormwater pond maintenance or other PCDD issues should be reported to the District Manager’s oRice at (407) 841-5524, ext. 147.

Adopted this 	 day of 	, 202  .

Chair – Poinciana PCDD Approved as to form:

Intent: this policy can only be for the PCDD ponds and covering PCDD residents and non-resident users. We need the Board to consider having a tiered rate for PWCDD vs non-Solivita residents.

Alternatively, PCDD and PWCDD may enter into some form of Interlocal Agreement whereas both districts mutually beneﬁt from the shared use of the ponds, but this would require PWCDD support. We are having Engineer conﬁrm if this is a shared stormwater system or if there any overlapping permits.

PWCDD can also adopt a similar ﬁshing policy and permit PCDD access.

DRAFT: 1/14/2026 (LLEB comments)
POINCIANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FISHING AND STORMWATER POND POLICIES

Recreational fishing in Poinciana Community Development District (PCDD) ponds is permitted AT YOUR OWN RISK. The District is not responsible for any loss, damage, or injury to any person or property arising out of the authorized or unauthorized use of the PCDD ponds or any other property within the District. Fishing is permitted only from the banks of PCDD stormwater ponds (Ponds) from dawn to dusk and subject to the terms and conditions herein. The Ponds may have steep banks and are not designed, nor permitted, for recreational use, and entry into or near the banks of the Ponds may be dangerous and could result in serious bodily harm. Entering into or wading in the Ponds is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Persons authorized to fish in PCDD Ponds: in order to fish in PCDD Ponds, adults (18 years of age or older) shall have in their possession a PCDD Fishing Pass. The PCDD Fishing Pass is provided following the successful completion of the Solivita Fishing Club (SFC) Fishing Training Program. The SFC shall maintain records of those individuals that completed the training, which shall include the date of the training and certification of the successful completion signed by a designated SFC trainer. PCDD residents, who have successfully completed the SFC training, shall receive the PCDD Fishing Pass at no charge, except that the SFC may charge PCDD residents a nominal fee to offset their costs of administering the program. Adults who do not reside or lease property within the PCDD, may obtain a PCDD Fishing Pass only after successfully completing the SFC training and shall pay an annual fee of $[	] (Non-Resident User Fee). [TBD: Residents of the Poinciana West Community Development District (PWCDD) may obtain a PCDD Fishing Pass only after successfully completing the SFC training and shall pay an annual fee of $[  ] (PWCDD User Fee).] The Non-Resident User Fee shall not be prorated and is only valid for the then-current calendar year and shall expire on December 31 of the year of issuance.

While fishing, minors and guests of PCDD residents are required to be supervised and accompanied by an adult possessing a PCDD Fishing Pass. Any person determined to be fishing while not in possession of a valid PCDD Fishing Pass must cease fishing
activities immediately upon request by PCDD personnel or another entity designated by PCDD. The Fishing Pass may be revoked at any time by PCDD for failure to comply with this Policy.

The Ponds are a habitat for dangerous wildlife, including poisonous snakes, snapping turtles, and alligators. Be aware that wildlife, both in and near Ponds, may be present and active, posing a serious threat to personal safety. Feeding or approaching alligators or any other wildlife is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Wildlife may not be removed from or released into the PCDD stormwater system. Anyone concerned about a nuisance alligator is encouraged to contact the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s toll-free Nuisance Alligator Hotline at 866-FWCGATOR (866-392-4286).

The Ponds are designed to gather and filter pollutants before they enter nearby natural bodies of water. Therefore, the Ponds may be contaminated with pollutants such as sediments, oils, grease, trash, heavy metals, pesticides, herbicides, and pathogens. Contact with the Ponds may be hazardous to health and safety. All fishing in the Ponds is strictly on a catch and release basis.

All trash must be properly disposed of off-site, including but not limited to fishing lines.

Boating on any Pond, canal, or culvert for any purpose other than maintenance or repair authorized by PCDD is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Alteration of the Ponds, including adding or removing plantings and vegetation, for any purpose is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. The PCDD retains all rights and remedies to pursue and collect costs for any damage to PCDD property or fines and penalties for noncompliance with stormwater permits.

The use of golf carts on any Pond bank or adjacent landscape buffer, or on any PCDD property that is otherwise adjacent to any Pond bank, canal, or culvert is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Residential/private property shall not be utilized or walked over to gain access to fishing areas. Easements through residential backyards along the community’s stormwater management system are for maintenance purposes only and are not general grants for access for fishing or any other recreational purpose. In order to fish
in the Ponds, users must gain access to the Ponds via common access areas. Parking of golf carts or any other vehicles on grassy or landscaped areas near or contiguous to the Ponds is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

The PCDD has identified the pond locations where fishing may be preferred (see attached map) and are identified with appropriate signage. In addition to this policy, all users shall obey all posted signage in connection with use of the Ponds. Fishing behind residential/private property is not recommended. At all times, fishing in the Ponds shall occur only from within PCDD property (as designated). Access to residents’ backyards via the maintenance easements is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. All users shall avoid fishing behind residential properties where the property line is in close proximity to the PCDD Pond. Residents have a reasonable expectation of privacy and security, so users should use common sense and respect when fishing on PCDD property so as not to trouble, inconvenience, or interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of the adjacent property by and of the homeowner. Upon request by the adjacent homeowner to move to an alternate location, the user shall immediately relocate to another Pond. Failure to do so could result in the revocation of the PCDD Fishing Pass.

All fishing shall comply with all applicable state and local laws, ordinances, codes, regulations, and permits. All users should be aware of and comply with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FWC’s) guidelines for freshwater fishing, including licensing requirements, to promote responsible fishing. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the PCDD shall at any time receive notice from any governmental agency or authority that the use(s) of the Ponds described herein violate any applicable state or local laws, ordinances, codes, regulations, permits or otherwise may place additional liability on the PCDD, the PCDD retains the right in its sole discretion to revoke all Passes and rescind this policy immediately, without notice; however, a statement shall be made at the next available PCDD Board meeting.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, all users or other members of the public shall comply with all PCDD directives in connection with the Ponds, including, but not limited to, temporary closure of the Ponds for maintenance, repair or any other reason within the sole discretion of PCDD.

Any stormwater pond maintenance or other PCDD issues should be reported to the District Manager’s office at (407) 841-5524, ext. 147.

Adopted this 	day of 	, 202  .

Chair – Poinciana PCDD Approved as to form:

Section B

Section VI
..	V

.),,
'
••	..
??f'
<?•·
)>	\
0
?
0
<),

Parcel ID: 282715933580006950	V	X

Data last updated on 1/14/2026
Parcel Details:	282715933580006950
SOUVrTA COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION INC
..._'1• ' 	
Physical Addr/P<>stal City& Zip:
Sh<>1t legal oesc:

DOR Code:
'
t.creage:
Th)(lng District:
VIA POLO CT POINCIANA 34759
SOUVlTA - PHASE SH· UNrT 1 PB 171 PG 37-43 TRACTFD·l LESS THAT PTLYJMG WITHIN
SOLIVITA· PHASE 51i • UNlT 3 AS REC IN PB 186 PGS 22-23
0900 (Vac. ReS-identlaJ / o, l{lsc
Imp. common E?me,ns/Areas)
6.8276
30000 (U-NINCORP/SOUnt Ft.
WMO)

Parcel ID: 282715933576006240

Data last updated on 1/14/2026

V	X	•
©))1
Pal'(ti oetall:s:
OWn-e(t:

PhySkal Addr/PoS€i!J Otv a Ztp?

Short 1.egai oesc:

OORCOde:

Acreage:
Tcucln9 Dlstt!<t:
2827159335760062?0
POIOCJAMA. COMMUtfiTY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
SAN RAPHAEt ST kl.SSIMMEE 34759
SOLNJTA PHASE SI PB 158 PG 1·4
TRACT P·l
0900(Vac. Reskfeotlat / or MlSc
tmp. common Elements/Meat)
8.3225
30000 (UNINCORP/SOunt fl
WH.D)

Section VII
Docusign Envelope ID: 62C4C30C-A716-44AA-AAD4-5EFA98C20392
P O L K  C O U N T Y 
Property Appraiser Neil Combee
2026 Data Sharing and Usage Agreement
Revised 12/2025
ADA Compliant

This Data Sharing and Usage Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Agreement,” establishes the terms and conditions
under which the Poinciana Community Development District
hereinafter

referred to as “agency,” can acquire and use Polk County Property Appraiser data that is exempt from Public Records disclosure as defined in FS 119.071.

In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the agency agrees to protect confidential data in accordance with FS 282.3185 and FS 501.171 and adhere to the standards set forth within these statutes.

For the purposes of this Agreement, all data is provided. It is the responsibility of the agency to apply all statutory guidelines relative to confidentiality and personal identifying information.
The confidentiality of personal identifying information including: names, mailing address and OR Book and Pages pertaining to parcels owned by individuals that have received exempt / confidential status, hereinafter referred to as “confidential data,” will be protected as follows:
The agency will not release confidential data that may reveal identifying information of individuals exempted from Public Records disclosure.
The agency will not present the confidential data in the results of data analysis (including maps) in any manner that would reveal personal identifying information of individuals exempted from Public Records disclosure.
The agency shall comply with all state laws and regulations governing the confidentiality and exempt status of personal identifying and location information that is the subject of this Agreement.
The agency shall ensure any employee granted access to confidential data is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
The agency shall ensure any third party granted access to confidential data is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Acceptance of these terms must be provided in writing to the agency by the third party before personal identifying information is released.
The agency agrees to comply with all regulations for the security of confidential personal information as defined in FS 501.171.
The agency, when defined as “local government” by FS 282.3185, is required to adhere to all cybersecurity guidelines when in possession of data provided or obtained from the Polk County Property Appraiser.

The term of this Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2026, and shall run until December 31, 2026, the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement shall not automatically renew. A new agreement will be provided annually to ensure all responsible parties are aware of and maintain the terms and conditions of this Data Sharing and Usage Agreement.
In witness of their agreement to the terms above, the parties or their authorized agents hereby affix their signatures.

POLK COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER

Agency:
Poinciana Community Development District
Signature: 	
Signature: 	
Print: Title: Date:
Neil Combee	 Polk County Property Appraiser  January 1, 2026	
Print: Title: Date:

Tricia Adams

	District Manager	

2025-12-09

Please email the signed agreement to pataxroll@polk-county.net.

Section VIII

Item will be provided under separate cover.

Section X

Item will be provided under separate cover.

Section XI

SERVICES AGREEMENT

PROPERTY NAME: Poinciana CDD
CUSTOMER NAME: Poinciana CDD
SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Removal of all fire flag from site D9. Replant with duck potato, pickerelweed, and gulf spikerush
EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/5/2025
SUBMITTED TO: Joel Blanco SUBMITTED BY: Alan Wilson

THIS SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is effective as of the date indicated above (the “Effective Date”), by and between SOLitude Lake Management, LLC (“SOLitude” or “Company”), and the customer identified above (the “Customer”), in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

SERVICES.  SOLitude will provide services (the “Services”) at the Customer’s property in accordance with the Scope of Services attached hereto as Schedule A.

MODIFICATIONS. Any deviation from the requirements and Services outlined in Schedule A involving extra cost of material and labor will result in extra charges. Such additional services will be provided by SOLitude only upon a Change Order mutually approved by the parties in writing (the “Change Order”).

PRICING. The Customer agrees to pay for the Services, as well as any applicable sales or other taxes, in accordance with the Pricing Schedule attached hereto as Schedule B.

PAYMENT. SOLitude shall invoice Customer following completion of each required Service. Payment is due within thirty (30) days of the invoice date. Any disputes with an invoice or invoices must be brought to the attention of SOLitude by written notice within one hundred and twenty (120) days from the invoice date, otherwise Company will not be liable for any potential credits or adjustments. The parties agree to use good faith efforts to resolve any disputed invoice amounts within thirty (30) days after written notification of a dispute. Disputed amounts shall not affect payment of all undisputed amounts, and Customer agrees to pay all undisputed amounts owed on any disputed invoice within the applicable due dates. Invoices not paid on or before the invoice due date shall accrue interest charges at a rate of one percent (1%) per month, accruing as of the invoice date, until the time that such amounts are paid in full. Additionally, the Customer is liable for payment of all costs of collection of past due accounts, specifically including, but not limited to, court costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys’ fees. In addition to the compensation paid to SOLitude for performance of the Services, Customer shall reimburse SOLitude for all of the expenses paid or incurred by SOLitude in connection with the Services, including, but not limited to non-routine expenses, administrative fees, compliance fees, or any other similar expense that are incurred as a result of requirements placed on SOLitude by the Customer that are not covered specifically by the written specifications of this Agreement (“Reimbursable Expenses”). Should the work performed be subject to any local, state, or federal jurisdiction, agency, or other organization of authority for sales or other taxes or fees in addition to those expressly covered by this contract, the customer will be invoiced and responsible for paying said additional taxes in addition to the contract price and other fees.

TERM AND EXPIRATION. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire upon completion of the Services required by Customer specified in Schedule A.

TERMINATION. In the event that this Agreement is terminated for any reason prior to SOLitude’s completion of the Services, Customer agrees to reimburse SOLitude for any costs incurred, including, but not limited to, labor costs, materials and fees, that SOLitude may have incurred in preparation for the provision of its Services.

RESERVED.

INSURANCE. SOLitude will maintain general liability and property damage insurance as necessary given the scope and nature of the Services. A certificate of insurance will be issued to Customer, upon request.

INDEMNIFICATION; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. THE CUSTOMER AGREES THAT THE WORK PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS INSURANCE, OR AS A COVENANT, GUARANTEE, WARRANTY, OR PROMISE OF ANY KIND THAT THE CUSTOMER IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANY LEGAL GUIDELINES OR REQUIREMENTS. COMPANY DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY REGARDING THE PRACTICES AND OPERATIONS OF THE CUSTOMER, AND BEARS NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR WHETHER THE CUSTOMER CARRIES OUT THE RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY COMPANY AND IN NO EVENT WILL COMPANY BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, OR ECONOMIC DAMAGES. THE CUSTOMER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD COMPANY HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, LIABILITIES, OBLIGATIONS, AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES OR COSTS BROUGHT BY ANY THIRD PARTIES, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR BY FAILURE OF THE CUSTOMER TO ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY LEGAL REQUIREMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SERVICES DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A. COMPANY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DELAY IN PERFORMING THE SERVICES, NOR LIABLE FOR ANY FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES, DUE TO ANY CAUSE BEYOND ITS REASONABLE CONTROL. COMPANY WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONLY THOSE DAMAGES, CLAIMS, CAUSES OF ACTION, INJURIES, OR LEGAL COSTS CAUSED BY ITS OWN DIRECT NEGLIGENCE OR MISCONDUCT, BUT THEN ONLY TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE ANNUAL FEES CHARGED UNDER THE AGREEMENT.

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. "Confidential Information" means any information disclosed by one party (“Discloser”) to the other party (“Recipient”), either directly or indirectly, in writing, orally, or by inspection of tangible objects, other than information that the Recipient can establish (i) was publicly known and made generally available in the public domain prior to the time of disclosure; (ii) becomes publicly known and made generally available after disclosure other than through Recipient’s action or inaction; or (iii) is in Recipient’s possession, without confidentiality restrictions, at the time of disclosure by Discloser as shown by Recipient’s files and records immediately prior to the time of disclosure. Recipient shall not at any time (a) disclose, sell, license, transfer, or otherwise make available to any person or entity any Confidential Information, or (b) use, reproduce, or otherwise copy any Confidential Information, except as necessary in connection with the purpose for which such Confidential Information is disclosed to Recipient or as required by applicable law. Recipient agrees to take all reasonable measures to protect the secrecy of and avoid disclosure and unauthorized use of the Confidential Information. All Confidential Information shall at all times remain the property of Discloser, and all documents, electronic media, and other tangible items containing or relating to any Confidential Information shall be delivered to Discloser immediately upon the request of Discloser.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Recipient is required by law, regulation, subpoena, government order, regulatory agency order, judicial order, or other court order to disclose any Confidential Information, Recipient shall give the Disclosing Party timely and lawful written notice of such a requirement prior to such disclosure, and shall reasonably

and lawfully cooperate with the Disclosing Party to seek a protective order, confidential treatment, or other appropriate measures for such Confidential Information.

FORCE MAJEURE.	The Company shall not be liable for any delay in performing the Services, nor liable for any failure to provide the Services, due to any cause beyond its reasonable control.

RIGHT TO SUBCONTRACT. The Company, in its sole discretion, may subcontract or delegate to an affiliate or third party any of its duties and obligations hereunder.

FUEL/TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE. Like many other companies that are impacted by the price of gasoline, a rise in gasoline prices may necessitate a fuel surcharge. As such, the Company reserves the right to add a fuel surcharge to Customer's invoice for any increase in the cost of fuel as measured above the same time period in the prior year (by the National U.S. Average Motor Gasoline-Regular Fuel Price per Gallon Index reported by the U.S. Department of Energy). The surcharge may be adjusted monthly (up or down) with the price of gasoline.

ANTI-CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY. Each party represents that neither it nor anyone acting on its behalf has offered, given, requested or accepted any undue financial or other advantage of any kind in entering into this Agreement, and that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations pertaining to corruption, competition and bribery in carrying out the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

E-VERIFY. SOLitude utilizes the federal E-Verify program in contracts with public employers as required by Florida State law, and acknowledges all the provisions of Florida Statute 448.095 are incorporated herein by reference and hereby certifies it will comply with the same.

GOVERNING LAW. Except for the Mandatory Arbitration Clause in Section 17 of this Agreement, which is governed by and construed in accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act, this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the state in which the Services are performed.

MANDATORY ARBITRATION. Any claim, dispute or controversy, regarding any contract, tort, statute, or otherwise (“Claim”), arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the relationships among the parties hereto shall be resolved by one arbitrator through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), under the AAA Commercial or Consumer, as applicable, Rules in effect at the time the Claim is filed (“AAA Rules”). Copies of the AAA Rules and forms can be located at www.adr.org, or by calling 1-800-778-7879. The arbitrator’s decision shall be final, binding, and non-appealable. Judgment upon the award may be entered and enforced in any court having jurisdiction. This clause is made pursuant to a transaction involving interstate commerce and shall be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. Neither party shall sue the other party other than as provided herein or for enforcement of this clause or of the arbitrator’s award; any such suit may be brought only in Federal District Court for the District in which the services were performed or, if any such court lacks jurisdiction, in any state court that has jurisdiction. The arbitrator, and not any federal, state, or local court, shall have exclusive authority to resolve any dispute relating to the interpretation, applicability, unconscionability, arbitrability, enforceability or formation of this Agreement including any claim that all or any part of the Agreement is void or voidable. Venue for arbitration hereunder shall be within the state where the customer’s property, that is the subject of the services provided, is located.

ASSIGNMENT. The Company may assign this Agreement to a related or affiliated entity upon written notice to the Customer.

NOTICES. All notices, requests, consents, claims, demands, waivers and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be directed to the individuals and addresses listed in the signature block. Notices sent in accordance with this Section shall be deemed effectively given: (a) when received, if delivered by hand (with written confirmation of receipt); (b) when received, if sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier (receipt requested); or (c) on the third (3rd) business day after the date mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid.

DISCLAIMER. SOLitude is not responsible for the failure of any treatment, equipment installation, or other work that may result from dam or other structural failures, severe weather and storms, flooding, or other acts of God that are outside of the control of SOLitude. Customer understands and acknowledges that there are irrigation restrictions associated with many of the products used to treat lakes and ponds. The Customer is responsible for notifying SOLitude in advance of the contract signing and the start of the Agreement if they utilize any of the water in their lakes or ponds for irrigation purposes. The Customer accepts full responsibility for any issues that may arise from the irrigation of turf, ornamentals, trees, crops, or any other plants as a result of treated water being used by the Customer for irrigation without the consent or knowledge of SOLitude. Although there is rarely direct fish toxicity with the products used for treatment when applied at the labeled rate, or the installation and normal operation of the equipment we install, there is a risk under certain circumstances of significant dissolved oxygen drops. This risk is most severe in times of extremely hot weather and warm water temperatures, as these are the conditions during which dissolved oxygen levels are naturally at their lowest levels. Oftentimes, lakes and ponds will experience natural fish kills under these conditions even if no work is performed. Every effort, to include the method and timing of application, the choice of products and equipment used, and the skill and training of the staff, is made to avoid such problems. However, the Customer understands and accepts that there is always a slight risk of the occurrence of adverse conditions outside the control of SOLitude that will result in the death of some fish and other aquatic life. The Customer also understands and accepts that similar risks would remain even if no work was performed. The Customer agrees to hold SOLitude harmless for any issues with fish or other aquatic life which occur as described above, or are otherwise outside the direct control of SOLitude, unless there is willful negligence on the part of SOLitude.

BINDING. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the legal representatives and successors of the parties.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT.  This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and replaces any prior agreements or understandings, whether in writing or otherwise. This Agreement may not be modified or amended except by written agreement executed by both parties. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is determined to be void, invalid, or unenforceable, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected.

SEVERABILITY. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining Terms and Conditions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

[SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON THE NEXT PAGE]

By signing below, the parties agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any accompanying schedules as of the Effective Date.

ACCEPTED AND APPROVED:

SOLITUDE LAKE MANAGEMENT, LLC.	[PCDD]

Signature: 		Signature: 	

Printed Name: 			Printed Name: 		 Title: 			Title: 	
Date: 		Date: 	

Please Remit All Payments to:	Customer’s Address for Notice Purposes:

SOLitude Lake Management, LLC
1320 Brookwood Drive Suite H		 Little Rock AR 72202

Please Mail All Notices and Agreements to:

SOLitude Lake Management, LLC 1253 Jensen Drive, Suite 103 Virginia Beach, VA 23451

SCHEDULE A – SCOPE OF SERVICES

All fireflag will be sprayed with herbicide, flush cut to the ground, and all cuttings hauled offsite for disposal.
In the areas where the fire flag was removed, 1000 bare root pickelweed, 1000 bare root duck potato, and 1000 bare root gulf spikerush will be planted. 3000 plants total will be planted to replace the fire flag.

SCHEDULE B – PRICING SCHEDULE

Total Price: $7,330.00 Price is valid for 60 days from the Effective Date Due upon execution of this Agreement: 50% of the Total Price
Due upon completion of the services: remaining 50% of the Total Price

Section XII

Section C

Section 1
Poinciana Community Development District Action Items December 2022

Meeting
Assigned	Action Item	Assigned To	Status	
Comments	

Ongoing	Monitor Central Florida Expressway - Poinciana Parkway Project: Parkway Connector	Former Chairman Lita Epstein	
In Process	Presentation facilitated 01.15.2025. Various CFX updates sent to BOS via electronic mail when received.	
Ongoing	Monitor Polk County Road Design for
Impact to PCDD Tunnels	District Engineer	On Hold		
Ongoing	Review of Wetlands and Ponds Owned by
Developer and HOA	District Engineer	On Hold	On hold as there is no current application for conveyance.	

03.20.2024	

Pond Water Quality Improvements	

Field Staff/Vice Chairman McKelvey	

In Process	
Field staff to provide proposals for littoral plantings, gambusia/grass shrimp, aerators, bacterial agents, and other interventions. Clam stocking approved for Ponds E16 and PC2 04.16.2025. Clams installed May 2025. Aerator Project and Try Marine proposals presented 07.16.2025. Board advised Aerator project top interest and Try Marine on backburner. Pond B1 Aerator project to be presented with solar option 09.17.2025.
Aerators put on back burner 09.17.2025. Board requested information for Grass Carp and Screens to be presented 11.19.2025. DE to review contributing factors to Pond B1 water quality issues.
Pond Dye to be discussed 01.21.2026	

Ongoing	Educate residents regarding beneficial pond vegetation and best maintenance practices and key CDD contact details		
Ongoing	PCDD Pond Specification flyer and CDD contact details released for electronic mail distribution 09.12.2025.	
11.20.2024	Eminent Domain Cypress Parkway	District Counsel	In Process	BOS approved retention letter with Gray Robinson 11.20.2024.	

07.16.2025	

Stormwater Maintenance	

Field Manager	

In Process	BOS approved proposals #405 (resetting grate B6, trench, pipe restore topsoil sod C1, remove plastic pipe A6 and C14 immediate repairs) COMPLETED 09.16.2025 and #406 (MES repairs to be facilitated when water level is low).	

07.16.2025	

Proposed Fishing Policies	

Vice Chair McKelvey	

In Process	Revised draft with legal and Board comments reviewed 08.20.2025. Board received comments from Solivita Fishing Club 09.17.2025 to be reviewed 10.15.2025. Proposed fishing location map circuated to BOS for comment and review 10.17.2025. Counsel preparing updated policy for review 01.21.2026.	
07.16.2025	Midge Management	Field Manager	In Process	Considering Gambusia and Grass Shrimp	
10.15.2025	Pond Study	Tony Reed	In Process	Investigating options for pond study.	

10.15.2025	Apian Place/E21/Fence/Gate Area License Agreement	
Jay Lazarovich	
In Process	Counsel to determine if easement agreement is needed for perpetual maintenance access.	

10.15.2025	

License Agreement for Maintenance of Tunnels		

In Process	
BOS approved agreement 10.15.2025. Execution pending. Avatar to be billed for maintenance on Avatar property. Proposal for ACPLM striping maintenance approved pending executed agreement.	

10.15.2025	Evaluate ownership and maintenace of Pond 1B at Via Rizzoli Drive		
In Process	Confirm pond partially owned by HOA. License agreement needed? Or conveyance?	

10.15.2025	
Erosion Repair Amalfi Lane	
Joel Blanco	
In Process	BOS approved Solitude Proposal 10.15.2025. HOA to be billed $8,800 12.19.2025.	

Section 2

Summary of Check Register

November 8, 2025 to January 12, 2026

	Fund		Date	Check No.'s		Amount		

General Fund								
		Truist	11/18/25	326-327	$		6,601.84	
			11/20/25	328	$		4,401.00	
			12/1/25	329-331	$		44,866.73	
			12/9/25	332-334	$		19,776.96	
			12/16/25	335-337	$		11,015.52	
			12/29/25	338-339	$		24,524.31	
$	111,186.36

Hancock Whitney	12/18/25	29	$	552,665.37
			Autopays	 $	373.39 	
				$	553,038.76	
	
Money Market	
11/18/25	
9	
$	3,518.22	
		12/1/25	10	$	100,000.00	
				$	103,518.22	
Payroll		November 2025
Anita L Nelson	
ACH	
$	184.70	
		Anthony Reed	ACH	$	84.70	
		Jon R Cameron	ACH	$	184.70	
		Richard B McKelvey	ACH	$	184.70	
		Robert W Zimbardi	50233	$	184.70	
				$	823.50	
				$	768,566.84	
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	1/14/26	PAGE	1
*** CHECK DATES 11/08/2025 - 01/12/2026 ***	POINCIANA - GENERAL FUND
BANK B MONEY MARKET

TSFR FFS FROM MM TO CDD

POIN POIN CDD	KCOSTA
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	1/14/26	PAGE	2
*** CHECK DATES 11/08/2025 - 01/12/2026 ***	POINCIANA - GENERAL FUND
BANK C GENERAL FUND
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME	STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK..... DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS				AMOUNT	#
11/18/25 00004 11/14/25 35912	202511 320-53800-46200	*	1,500.00
ONE TIME CLEAN UP 11/14
FLORALAWN 2 LLC	1,500.00 000326
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11/18/25 00001 11/01/25 309	202511 320-53800-12000	*	956.17
FIELD MANAGEMENT NOV 25
11/01/25 310	202511 310-51300-34000	*	3,898.83
MANAGEMENT FEE NOV 25
11/01/25 310	202511 310-51300-35200	*	74.42
WEBSITE ADMIN NOV 25
11/01/25 310	202511 310-51300-35100	*	111.58
INFORMATION TECH NOV 25
11/01/25 310	202511 310-51300-51000	*	.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES
11/01/25 310	202511 310-51300-42000	*	60.48
POSTAGE
GOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES	5,101.84 000327
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11/20/25 00044 11/20/25 WO-00913 202511 320-53800-49000	*	4,401.00
50% DEP E3DRAINSOX REPAIR
SOLITUDE LAKE MANAGEMENT	4,401.00 000328
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/01/25 00011 11/17/25 00103856 202511 320-53800-47100	*	15,722.31
AQUATIC MAINT NOV 25
CLARKE ENVIRONMENTAL MOSQUITO	15,722.31 000329
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/01/25 00004 12/01/25 36239	202512 320-53800-46200	*	16,322.42
LANDSCAPE MAINT DEC 25
FLORALAWN 2 LLC	16,322.42 000330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/01/25 00044 11/19/25 PSI22024 202511 320-53800-47000	*	12,822.00 AQUATIC MAINT NOV 25
SOLITUDE LAKE MANAGEMENT	12,822.00 000331
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/09/25 00017 11/03/25 2227149	202510 310-51300-31100	*	2,688.00
ENGINEER SVCS OCT 25
GAI CONSULTANTS, INC	2,688.00 000332
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/09/25 00027 11/12/25 147119	202510 310-51300-31500	*	4,266.96
GENERAL COUNSEL OCT 25
LATHAM LUNA EDEN & BEAUDINE	4,266.96 000333
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/09/25 00044 12/01/25 PSI22497 202512 320-53800-47000	*	12,822.00 AQUATIC MAINT	DEC25
SOLITUDE LAKE MANAGEMENT	12,822.00 000334
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POIN POIN CDD	KCOSTA
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	1/14/26	PAGE	3
*** CHECK DATES 11/08/2025 - 01/12/2026 ***	POINCIANA - GENERAL FUND
BANK C GENERAL FUND
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME	STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK..... DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS				AMOUNT	#
311	202512 320-53800-12000
FIELD MANAGEMENT DEC 25
312	202512 310-51300-34000
MANAGEMENT FEES DEC 25
312	202512 310-51300-35200
WEBSITE ADMIN DEC 25
312	202512 310-51300-35100
INFORMATION TECH DEC 25
312	202512 310-51300-51000
OFFICE SUPPLIES
12/01/25 312	202512 310-51300-42000	*	3.72
POSTAGE
12/01/25 312	202512 310-51300-42500	*	35.70
COPIES
12/01/25 312	202512 310-51300-42500	*	30.91
UPS COPIES BOARD MEETING
GOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES	5,111.48 000335
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/16/25 00017 12/04/25 2228920	202511 310-51300-31100	*	1,938.00
ENGINEER SVCS NOV25

CLARKE ENVIRONMENTAL MOSQUITO	15,722.31 000338
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/29/25 00044 12/16/25 PSI22688 202512 320-53800-49000	*	8,802.00 EROSION REPAIR
SOLITUDE LAKE MANAGEMENT	8,802.00 000339
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL FOR BANK C	111,186.36

POIN POIN CDD	KCOSTA
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	1/14/26	PAGE	4
*** CHECK DATES 11/08/2025 - 01/12/2026 ***	POINCIANA - GENERAL FUND
BANK D GENERAL FUND-HW

CHECK	VEND# DATE	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS	NAME	STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK.....
AMOUNT	#	
12/18/25 00013	12/17/25 12172025 202512 300-20700-10000		*	552,665.37	

- - - - - - - -	FY26 ASSESSMENT TSFR
POINCIANA CDD
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	
- - - - -	
- - - - - - - - - - -	552,665.37 000029
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -	
		TOTAL FOR	BANK D	552,665.37	

POIN POIN CDD	KCOSTA
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	1/14/26	PAGE	5
*** CHECK DATES 11/08/2025 - 01/12/2026 ***	POINCIANA - GENERAL FUND
BANK Z GENERAL FUND AUTOPAY
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME	STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK..... DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS				AMOUNT	#
11/10/25 00062 11/06/25 91008797 202510 320-53800-43000	*	34.99
1051 CYPRESS TUNNEL OCT25
DUKE ENERGY	34.99 080006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11/10/25 00062 11/06/25 91008797 202510 320-53800-43000	*	72.14
1051 CYPRESS LITES OCT25
DUKE ENERGY	72.14 080007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11/10/25 00062 11/06/25 91017299 202510 320-53800-43000	*	14.25
500 GENOA DR OCT 25
DUKE ENERGY	14.25 080008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12/08/25 00062 12/04/25 3720-11. 202511 320-53800-43000	*	32.48
1051 CYPRESS PK TUN NOV25
DUKE ENERGY	32.48 080009
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3960-11. 202511 320-53800-43000	*	65.11
1051 CYPRESS PKY LI NOV25
DUKE ENERGY	65.11 080010
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9846-11. 202511 320-53800-43000	*	19.50
500 GENOA DRIVE NOV 25
DUKE ENERGY	19.50 080011
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1/12/26 00062	1/07/26 3720-12. 202512 320-53800-43000	*	36.91
1051 CYPRESS PK TUN DEC25
DUKE ENERGY	36.91 080012
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1/12/26 00062	1/07/26 3960-12. 202512 320-53800-43000	*	77.60
1051 CYPRESS PK LIT DEC25
DUKE ENERGY	77.60 080013
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1/12/26 00062	1/07/26 9846-12. 202512 320-53800-43000	*	20.41
500 GENOA DR DEC 25
DUKE ENERGY	20.41 080014
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL FOR BANK Z	373.39
TOTAL FOR REGISTER	767,743.34
POIN POIN CDD	KCOSTA

Section 3

Poinciana
Community Development District

Unaudited Financial Reporting
November 30, 2025
Table of Contents

1		Balance Sheet	

2-3	
	General Fund	

4	
	Debt Service Fund - Series 2022	

5	
	Capital Reserve Fund	

6-7	
	Month to Month	

8	
	Assessment Receipt Schedule	
Community Development District Combined Balance Sheet November 30, 2025

	General		Debt Service		Capital Reserve		Totals		
	Fund		Fund		Fund	Governmental Funds			
Assets:									
Cash									
Operating - Hancock Whitney	$	623,241	$	-	$	-	$	623,241	
Operating - Truist	$	68,372	$	-	$	-	$	68,372	
Money Market - Bank United	$	435,448	$	-	$	215,888	$	651,336	
Investments									
Series 2022									
Reserve	$	-	$	134,145	$	-	$	134,145	
Revenue	$	-	$	438,319	$	-	$	438,319	
Interest	$	-	$	18	$	-	$	18	
Principal	$	-	$	124	$	-	$	124	
Prepayment	$	-	$	679	$	-	$	679	
Due from General Fund	$	-	$	332,184	$	-	$	332,184	
Total Assets	$	1,127,060	$	905,467	$	215,888	$	2,248,416	
Liabilities:									
Accounts Payable	$	41,770	$	-	$	-	$	41,770	
Due to Debt Service	$	332,184	$	-	$	-	$	332,184	
Total Liabilites	$	373,954	$	-	$	-	$	373,954	
Fund Balance:									
Assigned for:									
Capital Reserves	$	-	$	-	$	215,888	$	215,888	
Restricted for:									
Debt Service	$	-	$	905,467	$	-	$	905,467	
Unassigned	$	753,106	$	-	$	-	$	753,106	
Total Fund Balances	$	753,106	$	905,467	$	215,888	$	1,874,462	
									
Total Liabilities & Fund Balance	$	1,127,060	$	905,467	$	215,888	$	2,248,416	
Community Development District General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For The Period Ending November 30, 2025

Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
Budget	Thru 11/30/25	Thru 11/30/25	Variance	

Revenues:					
Assessments - Tax Roll	$	886,925	$	238,447	$	238,447	$	-	
Interest	$	8,673	$	445	$	2,670	$	2,225	
Total Revenues	$	895,598	$	238,892	$	241,217	$	2,325	

Expenditures:					
General & Administrative:					
Supervisors Fees	$	12,000	$	2,000	$	3,000	$	(1,000)	
FICA Expense	$	918	$	153	$	230	$	(77)	
Engineering	$	20,000	$	3,333	$	4,626	$	(1,293)	
Attorney	$	35,000	$	5,833	$	8,233	$	(2,400)	
Annual Audit	$	3,200	$	-	$	-	$	-	
Trustee Fees	$	4,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	
Assessment Administration	$	5,408	$	5,408	$	5,408	$	(1)	
Management Fees	$	46,786	$	7,798	$	7,798	$	(0)	
Information Technology	$	1,339	$	223	$	223	$	0	
Website Maintenance	$	893	$	149	$	149	$	(0)	
Telephone	$	100	$	17	$	-	$	17	
Postage	$	2,600	$	433	$	111	$	322	
Printing & Binding	$	500	$	83	$	13	$	70	
Insurance	$	8,927	$	8,927	$	8,228	$	699	
Legal Advertising	$	5,500	$	917	$	-	$	917	
Other Current Charges	$	2,400	$	400	$	302	$	98	
Office Supplies	$	400	$	67	$	1	$	66	
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	$	175	$	175	$	175	$	-	
Total General & Administrative:	$	150,146	$	35,916	$	38,496	$	(2,580)	
General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For The Period Ending November 30, 2025

Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
Budget	Thru 11/30/25	Thru 11/30/25	Variance	

Operations & Maintenance					
Field Services	$	11,474	$	1,912	$	1,912	$	-	
Property Insurance	$	25,494	$	25,494	$	22,722	$	2,772	
Electric	$	1,800	$	300	$	238	$	62	
Landscape Maintenance	$	205,665	$	34,278	$	34,145	$	133	
Aquatic Control Maintenance	$	165,444	$	27,574	$	25,570	$	2,004	
Aquatic Midge Management	$	191,733	$	31,956	$	30,866	$	1,090	
Pressure Washing	$	12,000	$	2,000	$	-	$	2,000	
Lift Station Maintenance	$	3,000	$	500	$	-	$	500	
R&M - Plant Replacement	$	10,000	$	1,667	$	-	$	1,667	
Storm Structure Repairs	$	41,616	$	6,936	$	-	$	6,936	
Stormwater Water Quality/Landscape Improvements	$	23,500	$	3,917	$	-	$	3,917	
Contingency	$	12,000	$	2,000	$	4,662	$	(2,662)	
Total Operations & Maintenance:	$	703,727	$	138,533	$	120,115	$	18,418	

Other Expenditures					
Transfer Out - Capital Reserve	$	41,726	$	-	$	-	$	-	
Total Other Expenditures	$	41,726	$	-	$	-	$	-	
					
Total Expenditures	$	895,598	$	174,449	$	158,611	$	15,838	
					
Net Change in Fund Balance	$	-		$	82,606		
					
Fund Balance - Beginning	$	-		$	670,500		
					
Fund Balance - Ending	$	-		$	753,106		
Debt Service Fund - Series 2022
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For The Period Ending November 30, 2025

	Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
	Budget	Thru 11/30/25	Thru 11/30/25	Variance	

Revenues:					
Assessments - Tax Roll	$	1,278,850	$	332,184	$	332,184	$	-	
Interest	$	20,000	$	3,333	$	4,262	$	929	
Total Revenues	$	1,298,850	$	335,517	$	336,446	$	929	

Expenditures:					
Series 2022
Interest - 11/1	
$	85,738	
$	85,738	
$	85,518	
$	221	
Special Call -11/1	$	-	$	-	$	15,000	$	(15,000)	
Principal - 5/1	$	1,124,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	
Interest - 5/1	$	85,738	$	-	$	-	$	-	
Total Expenditures	$	1,295,477	$	85,738	$	100,518	$	(14,779)	
					
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures	$	3,373		$	235,928		
					
Net Change in Fund Balance	$	3,373		$	235,928		
					
Fund Balance - Beginning	$	523,210		$	669,539		
					
Fund Balance - Ending	$	526,583		$	905,467		

	Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
	Budget	Thru 11/30/25	Thru 11/30/25	Variance	

Revenues:

Interest	

$	5,000	

$	833	

$	1,313	

$	480	
Total Revenues	$	5,000	$	833	$	1,313	$	480	

Expenditures:

Capital Outlay	

$	-	

$	-	

$	-	

$	-	
Total Expenditures	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	
					
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures	$	5,000		$	1,313		

Other Financing Sources/(Uses):

Transfer In/(Out)	

$	41,726	

$	-	

$	-	

$	-	
Total Other Financing Sources/(Uses)	$	41,726	$	-	$	-	$	-	
					
Net Change in Fund Balance	$	46,726		$	1,313		
					
Fund Balance - Beginning	$	214,104		$	214,575		
					
Fund Balance - Ending	$	260,830		$	215,888		

Revenues:

Assessments - Tax Roll Interest

$	-  $
$	1,379  $

238,447  $
1,290  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

238,447
2,670

Expenditures:

General & Administrative:

Supervisors Fees FICA Expense Engineering Attorney
Annual Audit Trustee Fees
Assessment Administration Management Fees Information Technology Website Maintenance Telephone
Postage
Printing & Binding Insurance
Legal Advertising Other Current Charges Office Supplies
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions

$	2,000  $
$	153  $
$	2,688  $
$	4,267  $
$	-  $
$	-  $
$	5,408  $
$	3,899  $
$	112  $
$	74  $
$	-  $
$	50  $
$	13  $
$	8,228  $
$	-  $
$	201  $
$	0  $
$	175  $

1,000  $
77  $
1,938  $
3,966  $
-  $
-  $
-  $
3,899  $
112  $
74  $
-  $
60  $
-  $
-  $
-  $
101  $
0  $
-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

3,000
230
4,626
8,233
-
- 5,408
7,798
223
149
- 111
13
8,228
- 302
1
175

Operation and Maintenance

Field Services Property Insurance Electric
Landscape Maintenance Aquatic Control Maintenance Aquatic Midge Management Pressure Washing
Lift Station Maintenance R&M - Plant Replacement Storm Structure Repairs Contingency

$	956  $
$	22,722  $
$	121  $
$	16,322  $
$	12,748  $
$	15,143  $
$	-  $
$	-  $
$	-  $
$	-  $
$	11  $

956  $
-  $
117  $
17,822  $
12,822  $
15,722  $
-  $
-  $
-  $
-  $
4,651  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $
-  $	-  $

1,912
22,722
238
34,145
25,570
30,866
-
-
-
- 4,662

Other Expenditures
Transfer Out - Capital Reserve

$	-  $

-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $

-  $	-  $	-  $	-

Poinciana
Community Development District Special Assessment Receipts Fiscal Year 2026

MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS

Gross Assessments $ Certified Net Assessments  $

953,675.91
886,918.60

100%

11/10/25	10/20/25-10/21/25	$	15,058.65	$	(776.33)	$	(285.64)	$0.00	$	13,996.68	$	13,996.68	
11/14/25	10/1/25-10/31/25	$	11,830.18	$	(709.76)	$	(227.20)	$0.00	$	10,893.22	$	10,893.22	
11/21/25	11/1/25-11/7/25	$	132,152.26	$	(5,286.30)	$	(2,537.32)	$0.00	$	124,328.64	$  124,328.64	
11/26/25	11/8/25-11/15/25	$	95,077.27	$	(4,027.43)	$	(1,821.00)	$0.00	$	89,228.84	$	89,228.84	
Total Collected	$	254,118.36	$	(10,799.82)	$	(4,871.16)	$	-	$	238,447.38	$  238,447.38		
Percentage Collected						27%		

DEBT SERVICE ASSESSMENTS

Gross Assessments Certified Net Assessments

$ 1,372,863.26
$ 1,276,762.83

100%

11/10/25	10/20/25-10/21/25	$	22,016.31	$	(1,144.50)	$	(417.44)	$0.00	$	20,454.37	$	20,454.37	
11/14/25	10/1/25-10/31/25	$	16,206.58	$	(1,009.76)	$	(311.27)	$0.00	$	14,885.55	$	14,885.55	
11/21/25	11/1/25-11/7/25	$	181,359.38	$	(7,255.08)	$	(3,482.09)	$0.00	$	170,622.21	$  170,622.21	
11/26/25	11/8/25-11/15/25	$	134,532.89	$	(5,735.34)	$	(2,575.95)	$0.00	$	126,221.60	$  126,221.60	
Total Collected	$	354,115.16	$	(15,144.68)	$	(6,786.75)	$	-	$	332,183.73	$  332,183.73		
Percentage Collected						26%		

Section D

Item will be provided under separate cover.

Section 1

Item will be provided under separate cover.

Section 2

Item will be provided under separate cover.

Section 3

Item will be provided under separate cover.